📌 Snapshot
- How managers turn plans into teamwork: the four steps, two structures and who holds the authority.
- The four steps of organising and the seven reasons it matters, followed through one running business example.
- Functional vs divisional structure, formal vs informal organisation and delegation vs decentralisation, each in a single table.
- The authority, responsibility and accountability trap, and the exam wording that catches students out.
📖 Detailed Notes
Written and reviewed by Rohit Singh, Computer Science & Commerce faculty at UniDrill (MCA, Osmania University · 6 years teaching). Based on NCERT Business Studies Class XII, Chapter 5.
Why does a two-person bakery need no org chart, but a bakery chain does?
Meera starts a bakery with one helper. They bake, sell, order flour and count cash together, and nobody needs to be told who does what. Two years later she has three outlets and 45 people. Cakes are baked twice because two shop managers ordered the same thing, nobody knows who should approve a discount, and the flour supplier gets three different phone calls a week.
Meera has made her plans. What she lacks is an arrangement of people and work that lets the plans happen. That arrangement is what this chapter is about. Organising is the function that turns a plan into a working machine, and it is the reason a business can grow beyond the founder's own two hands.
What organising is, and the four steps
Organising is the process of identifying and grouping the work to be done, defining and delegating authority and responsibility, and establishing relationships so that people can work together effectively. Louis Allen's definition says exactly this, and Theo Haimann puts it as defining and grouping the activities of the enterprise and establishing authority relationships among them. In plain words: it coordinates human effort and resources into one unit that can reach the objectives.
The process runs in a fixed order, because each step needs the one before it. You cannot group jobs you have not identified, and you cannot assign duties to departments that do not exist yet.
| Step | What the manager does | Meera's bakery |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Identification and division of work | Lists all the work needed to meet the plan and breaks it into manageable jobs | Baking, packing, billing, buying flour, deliveries, cleaning |
| 2. Departmentalisation | Groups similar or related jobs into departments, usually by function, product or territory | Production, Sales, Purchase, Delivery |
| 3. Assignment of duties | Gives each job to the person best suited to it, with each department under one in-charge | A trained baker heads Production; a good negotiator takes Purchase |
| 4. Establishing reporting relationships | Decides who reports to whom, which creates the hierarchy and a path for coordination | Counter staff report to the shop manager, who reports to Meera |
The process in one line: identify and divide the work → departmentalise → assign duties → establish reporting relationships.
Why organising matters
Each of the seven benefits below answers a problem that Meera's bakery would otherwise face.
| Benefit | What it means | Meera's bakery |
|---|---|---|
| Benefits of specialisation | Work is divided so people repeat one kind of task and become expert | A baker who only bakes becomes faster and more consistent |
| Clarity in working relationships | Everyone knows who reports to whom and who is answerable for what | A shop assistant knows the shop manager approves discounts |
| Optimum utilisation of resources | Clear jobs avoid overlap and confusion, so no resource is wasted or idle | One purchase desk instead of three people ordering flour |
| Adaptation to change | A well-designed structure lets the business adjust to changes around it and survive | Adding home delivery when customers start ordering online |
| Effective administration | Clear descriptions of jobs and relationships prevent confusion and duplicate work | Written job roles, so no cake is baked twice |
| Development of personnel | Delegation reduces the manager's load and lets subordinates build skills and creativity | The shop manager learns to run a store without Meera |
| Expansion and growth | The enterprise can add jobs, departments and products without breaking the structure | Opening a catering unit as a new department |
Organisation structure and span of management
The organisation structure is the framework within which managerial and operating tasks are performed. It is the result of the organising process and is usually drawn as an organisation chart. Peter Drucker's warning is the line to remember: the wrong structure will seriously impair business performance and can even destroy it.
The span of management is the number of subordinates that a superior can effectively manage. It decides how many levels the structure has, not how many departments.
| If the span is | Levels in the structure | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Narrow (few subordinates per manager) | More levels, a tall structure | Close supervision, but slower communication and higher managerial cost |
| Wide (many subordinates per manager) | Fewer levels, a flat structure | Faster communication, but each manager has less time per person |
Pause and predict: Meera has 45 staff. If every manager can effectively handle 5 people, will her structure have more or fewer levels than if every manager can handle 15?
Check your answer: More levels. A narrow span means you need more managers to cover everyone, and managers need managers above them, so the chart grows taller.
Functional structure: group by what people do
In a functional structure, jobs of a similar nature are grouped together as departments such as production, purchase, marketing, finance and personnel. Each department is headed by a manager who reports to a coordinating head such as the managing director.
Take Kaveri Cycles, which makes one model of bicycle in very large numbers. All its welders, assemblers and quality checkers sit in Production. All its buyers sit in Purchase. All its sales staff sit in Marketing. Because the work is one product made repeatedly, grouping by function lets each department get very good at its own job.
| Aspect | Functional structure |
|---|---|
| Advantages | Occupational specialisation; control and coordination within each department; higher managerial and operational efficiency; minimum duplication of effort, so economies of scale; training of employees is easier; each function gets due attention |
| Disadvantages | Heads may focus on their own department's goals and forget the organisation's (functional empires); coordination across departments is hard; conflicts of interest between departments; a narrow, inflexible view; functional heads do not get the all round experience needed for top posts |
| Suitability | Large organisations with diversified activities that need a high degree of specialisation |
Divisional structure: group by what the business sells
In a divisional structure the organisation is split into self-contained units, usually by product line. Each division has its own manager with authority over the unit, each is multifunctional (it has its own purchase, marketing, HR and so on) and each works as a profit centre.
Navrang Group sells cosmetics, garments and footwear. Instead of one purchase department for everything, each of the three divisions buys, markets and hires for itself. If footwear loses money, you know exactly whose numbers to look at.
| Aspect | Divisional structure |
|---|---|
| Advantages | Product specialisation, which prepares divisional heads for higher posts; easy to fix responsibility for profit; quick decisions because each unit is autonomous; easy to expand by adding another division |
| Disadvantages | Divisions may compete for funds; activities such as HR and marketing are duplicated, so costs rise; a divisional head may put the division's interest above the organisation's |
| Suitability | Firms that make a large variety of products using different resources; growing firms that keep adding employees, departments and levels |
The exam almost always asks you to compare the two. Learn the row labels, because the question usually changes only the structure named.
| Basis | Functional structure | Divisional structure |
|---|---|---|
| Formation | Based on functions | Based on product lines (and each division has all functions) |
| Specialisation | Functional specialisation | Product specialisation |
| Responsibility | Difficult to fix on any one department | Easy to fix, because each division is a profit centre |
| Managerial development | Difficult, as managers specialise in one function | Easier, as a divisional head handles all functions of a product |
| Cost | Economical, no duplication | Costly, as functions are duplicated across divisions |
| Coordination | Difficult when there are many products | Easy within a product line |
Beyond the textbook. For the exam: the two structures are presented as a choice between functional and divisional. In reality: most large firms are hybrids. A divisional company often keeps shared services such as finance, legal or HR at the centre to avoid duplication, while its divisions are still organised functionally inside. Why it matters: when a case describes a mixed arrangement, identify the main basis of grouping (function or product) rather than looking for a perfect fit.
Formal and informal organisation
Meera's bakery has an official chart. It also has a group of four counter staff who walk home together, cover each other's shifts and know all the news a day before the managers do. Both are real, and both shape how work gets done.
A formal organisation is the structure designed by management to achieve organisational goals. It specifies who has authority over whom, who is responsible for what, and how departments coordinate. An informal organisation is the network of social relationships among employees that arises spontaneously from their interaction, beyond the officially defined roles.
| Basis | Formal organisation | Informal organisation |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | Structure of jobs with defined authority and responsibility | Network of social relations among employees |
| Origin | Deliberately created by top management; follows rules | Arises spontaneously from social interaction |
| Authority | Comes from the position held | Comes from personal qualities |
| Behaviour | Governed by rules, with a set pattern | No set pattern; shaped by group norms |
| Communication | Flows through the official channel, the scalar chain | Flows in any direction through its own channels |
| Nature | Rigid | Flexible |
| Leadership | Managers appointed by the organisation | Leaders chosen by the group |
Each has strengths and weaknesses, and a good manager uses both.
| Aspect | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Formal | Easier to fix responsibility; no role ambiguity; unity of command; effective achievement of goals; stability | Procedural delays; little room for initiative and creativity; does not give the full picture of human relationships |
| Informal | Faster spread of information and feedback; fulfils social needs and raises job satisfaction; fills gaps in the formal structure | Rumours can spread and do damage; may resist change; pressure to conform to group norms can hold back individual talent |
Beyond the textbook. For the exam: informal organisation is a feature of every formal organisation, and the manager should recognise it. In reality: the famous Hawthorne studies at a Western Electric plant in the early twentieth century found that worker groups set their own informal output norms and that these could matter as much as pay or physical conditions. Why it matters: managers who treat informal groups as the enemy lose a valuable early warning system. Those who use them well spot problems before they appear in a report.
Delegation: sharing the work, keeping the answer
A manager cannot do everything. Delegation is the downward transfer of authority from a superior to a subordinate so that the work can be shared. Louis Allen describes it as the process by which a manager divides the work, performs the part only he can do effectively, and gets others to help with the rest.
Delegation has three elements, and the exam tests the differences between them again and again.
| Aspect | Authority | Responsibility | Accountability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meaning | The right to command subordinates and act within the scope of the position | The obligation of a subordinate to perform the assigned duty | Answerability for the final outcome of the task |
| Arises from | The formal position | The superior and subordinate relationship (the assignment of duty) | Responsibility |
| Direction of flow | Downward | Upward | Upward |
| Can it be delegated? | Yes | Cannot be shifted entirely | No |
The summary line is worth memorising: authority is delegated, responsibility is assumed, accountability is imposed. Authority must also be commensurate with responsibility. If you hold a subordinate responsible for a result but give no authority to act, the arrangement fails.
Imran, a store manager, lets cashier Pooja approve refunds up to Rs 2,000. Pooja now has authority. She is responsible for approving refunds properly. If she approves a fake claim, Imran still has to answer to the regional manager for the store's refund losses. He cannot say "I delegated it".
Pause and predict: a manager delegates an entire task to a subordinate and then says, "Now it is no longer my problem." Which element has he forgotten about?
Check your answer: Accountability. Authority can be passed down and the subordinate takes on responsibility, but the manager remains answerable to his own superior for the final result.
Delegation is also what makes the hierarchy possible, and it pays off in six ways.
| Importance of delegation | What it gives |
|---|---|
| Effective management | The manager is freed from routine and can focus on important, strategic work |
| Employee development | Subordinates get chances to use skills and prepare for higher posts |
| Motivation of employees | Being trusted with authority increases confidence and job satisfaction |
| Facilitation of growth | Capable subordinates are ready to run new units when the business expands |
| Basis of management hierarchy | Delegation is what creates superior and subordinate levels |
| Better coordination | Authority, responsibility and accountability are clearly linked at each level |
Decentralisation: delegation as a policy
Decentralisation is the systematic effort to delegate to the lowest level all authority except that which can be exercised only at central points. It is a philosophy of selective dispersal of authority, based on the belief that people lower down are competent and capable of taking decisions. The opposite, centralisation, keeps decision making authority with higher levels.
No organisation is entirely centralised or entirely decentralised. If everything were centralised, one person would take every decision, which is impossible beyond a very small business. If everything were decentralised, there would be no central direction left. Excessive centralisation causes slow decisions, overload at the top and loss of initiative below. Excessive decentralisation causes lack of unified action, conflict between units, duplication and loss of overall control.
| Importance of decentralisation | What it gives |
|---|---|
| Develops initiative among subordinates | Lower managers take real decisions and learn from them |
| Develops managerial talent for the future | A bank of trained managers ready for higher posts |
| Quick decision making | Decisions are taken near the problem without waiting for top management |
| Relief to top management | Top managers concentrate on policy and strategy |
| Facilitates growth | New units can be added, each with authority to run itself |
| Better control | Performance of each unit can be measured, which compels management to develop good measurement systems |
Delegation and decentralisation are close cousins, but they are not the same thing.
| Basis | Delegation | Decentralisation |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | A compulsory act, because no individual can perform all tasks alone | An optional policy decision of top management |
| Freedom of action | Less, as the superior keeps control over the subordinate | More, as managers take their own decisions |
| Status | A process used to share work | The result of a policy decision |
| Scope | Narrow: between a superior and the immediate subordinate | Wide: extends to the lowest level of the organisation |
| Purpose | Lessens the burden of the superior | Increases the role of subordinates |
Exam traps
| The trap | Why it is tempting | The truth |
|---|---|---|
| "Setting standards is a step in organising." | It sounds like planning and organising together | Setting standards belongs to controlling. Organising has four steps: identify and divide work, departmentalise, assign duties, establish reporting relationships |
| "Accountability can be delegated along with authority." | Authority and accountability both feel like parts of a job | Authority is delegated, responsibility is assumed, accountability is imposed and cannot be passed down |
| "Span of management is the number of departments." | Both words describe size | It is the number of subordinates a superior can effectively manage, and it decides the number of levels |
| "Divisional structure is cheaper than functional." | Smaller units seem simpler | Divisional structure duplicates functions in every division, so it is costlier. Functional is the economical one |
| "Fixing responsibility is easy in a functional structure." | Each department has a clear head | It is difficult, because work flows across departments. In the divisional structure, each division's profit makes responsibility easy to fix |
| "Informal organisation is created by top management." | It exists inside the company | It arises spontaneously from social interaction. Formal organisation is the deliberately designed one |
| "Delegation and decentralisation have the same scope." | Both push authority downward | Delegation is narrow (superior and immediate subordinate). Decentralisation reaches the lowest level and is an optional policy |
| "Decentralisation means no central control." | Authority is spread out | Authority that can only be exercised centrally stays at the centre. Excessive decentralisation is a problem, not the aim |
60-second revision
| Topic | Lock this in |
|---|---|
| Organising steps | Identify and divide work → departmentalise → assign duties → establish reporting relationships |
| Seven benefits | Specialisation · clear relationships · resource use · adaptation to change · effective administration · development of personnel · expansion and growth |
| Span of management | Subordinates per superior; narrow span means more levels |
| Functional structure | Groups by function; economical; hard to fix responsibility; suits large, specialised firms |
| Divisional structure | Groups by product; profit centres; costly through duplication; suits multi product firms |
| Formal vs informal | Designed vs spontaneous; position authority vs personal authority; scalar chain vs any direction |
| Delegation elements | Authority (downward, delegable) · responsibility (upward, assumed) · accountability (upward, imposed) |
| Delegation vs decentralisation | Compulsory act vs optional policy; narrow vs wide; less vs more freedom |
Where this chapter connects
- Previous: Planning gives organising its objectives and plans. A structure is only useful if it serves a plan.
- Next: Staffing fills the positions that organising creates with the right people.
- Related: Principles of Management covers division of work, unity of command and the scalar chain, which are the ideas behind the structures in this chapter.
🎯 Practice MCQs
First 3 questions free · create a free account to unlock the rest — answers & explanations included, no payment needed
Q1. Meera lists everything her bakery does, such as baking, packing, billing and deliveries, and splits it into separate manageable jobs. Which step of the organising process is this?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Listing all the work and breaking it into jobs is the first step. Departmentalisation comes next and groups these jobs, assignment gives them to people, and reporting relationships come last.
Q2. Arrange the steps of organising in the correct order. (i) Assignment of duties (ii) Departmentalisation (iii) Establishing reporting relationships (iv) Identification and division of work
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Work is identified and divided first, then grouped into departments, then duties are assigned to individuals, and finally authority and reporting relationships are fixed. The other options put departments or duties ahead of the work they depend on.
Q3. Kaveri Cycles makes one model of bicycle in large numbers. It has separate departments for production, purchase, marketing, finance and human resources, each headed by a manager who reports to the managing director. Which structure is this, and what is its main advantage?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Grouping jobs by function is the functional structure, and its strengths are specialisation and economies from avoiding duplication. Profit centres, self contained units and easy fixing of responsibility belong to the divisional structure.
🔒 9 more practice MCQs
Create a free account to unlock every MCQ in this chapter — answers and explanations included. No payment needed.
Already registered? Just log in and they'll all appear here.
Q4. Navrang Group sells cosmetics, garments and footwear. Each business is run as a separate unit with its own purchase, marketing and HR staff, and its head is answerable for that unit's profit. Which statement is correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Self contained product based units are divisions. Because purchase, marketing and HR are repeated in each division, costs rise. Responsibility is easy to fix, not difficult, since each division is a profit centre.
Q5. Read the statements. Statement I: A formal organisation is deliberately created by top management, and authority in it comes from the position held. Statement II: In an informal organisation, leaders are chosen by the group and the structure arises from social interaction. Statement III: Communication in an informal organisation flows only along the scalar chain. Which statements are correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Statements I and II correctly describe formal and informal organisation. Statement III is wrong, because strict flow along the scalar chain is a feature of formal organisation. Informal communication moves in any direction.
Q6. Workers in the packing section often have lunch together. Before management announced a change in shift timings, they already knew about it and jointly decided to request a later start. This situation shows the working of:
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
A network of social relationships that spreads information quickly outside official channels is informal organisation. It was not designed by management and it has no authority from position. Decentralisation is a policy of top management, and divisional structure is a formal design.
Q7. Match List I with List II. List I: (i) Authority (ii) Responsibility (iii) Accountability (iv) Delegation. List II: (p) Obligation of a subordinate to perform the assigned duty (q) Right to command and take action within the position (r) Answerability for the final outcome (s) Downward transfer of authority
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Authority is the right to command, responsibility is the obligation to perform, accountability is answerability for the result, and delegation is the downward transfer of authority. The other options swap two or more of these pairs.
Q8. Store manager Imran authorises cashier Pooja to approve refunds up to Rs 2,000. Pooja approves a fraudulent refund. Which statement is correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Authority can be delegated and responsibility is assumed by the subordinate, but accountability cannot be passed down. The manager who delegated stays answerable to his own superior.
Q9. Which of the following is a correct difference between delegation and decentralisation?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Delegation is unavoidable, while decentralisation is a choice of top management. Options A and B reverse the nature and scope. In option D, freedom of action is less under delegation and more under decentralisation.
Q10. Assertion (A): No organisation can be completely centralised. Reason (R): No manager can personally take every decision, so some authority must be passed to lower levels.
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Complete centralisation would require one person to decide everything, which is impossible beyond a very small unit. Because some delegation is unavoidable, the reason directly explains the assertion.
Q11. Which statement about span of management is correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Span of management is subordinates per superior, and a narrower span means more levels. Option C describes the scalar chain, and option D is connected with unity of command.
Q12. A growing cosmetics company easily adds a hair care product line, new jobs and a new department because its structure was designed to take on more work. Which importance of organising does this show?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Organising allows an enterprise to add new product lines, jobs and departments without disturbing the existing set up, which is expansion and growth. Clarity of relationships is about who reports to whom, and specialisation is about repeating one kind of work.
📊 Previous-Year Questions
Practise with real CUET Business Studies previous-year papers — every question solved, with the correct answer and a step-by-step explanation.
View solved CUET PYQ papers →Ready to drill Business Studies?
Unlock all MCQs, chapter tests, mocks & PYQs for ₹199/year.
Get UniDrill Pro