Home / Political Science / Class XI / Executive
Executive — CUET Political Science hero
Class XI ⚖️ Political Science Ch 12 of 18

Executive

CUET unit: Indian Constitution at Work — Executive (Parliamentary executive, President, PM & Council of Ministers, Bureaucracy)

📌 Snapshot

  • Who really runs India: the President, the Prime Minister or the civil servants? Powers explained for CUET.
  • The three types of executive, why India chose the parliamentary system and what Article 74(1) means in practice.
  • The President's three discretions, the Vice-President, collective responsibility and the 91st Amendment cap.
  • The permanent executive: how civil servants are recruited, why they must be neutral and who controls IAS and IPS.

📖 Detailed Notes

Written and reviewed by Subhra Gupta, Humanities faculty at UniDrill (M.A. Sociology, University of Delhi · 7 years teaching Humanities). Based on NCERT Political Science Class XI (Indian Constitution at Work), Chapter 4.

Who is really in charge: the person who signs or the person who decides?

Every law that Parliament passes becomes an Act only when the President signs it. Every Prime Minister is sworn in by the President. Yet no one says the President runs the country. This chapter explains the gap between who holds power on paper and who uses it, and why the Constitution built the system that way. If you can explain that gap, you can answer most questions on this chapter.

What the executive is

Government has three organs. The legislature makes laws, the judiciary interprets them and the executive carries them out. In practice the executive also takes the lead in framing policy, because it has the information and the machinery.

The executive itself has two parts, and CUET likes to test the difference.

Feature Political executive Permanent executive
Who Heads of government and the ministers Civil servants (the bureaucracy)
How they get the job Elected, directly or indirectly Recruited through exams (UPSC and State PSCs)
Tenure Changes with elections Stays until retirement
Role Overall responsibility for policy Day to day administration and advice
Expected attitude Accountable to the voters Politically neutral

Three types of executive

Different countries answer the question "who heads the state and who runs the government?" in different ways.

Type Head of State and Head of Government Examples Key feature
Presidential The President is both USA, Brazil, most of Latin America The President holds executive power directly and is not chosen by the legislature
Parliamentary A President or monarch is the formal head of state; the Prime Minister is head of government India, UK, Germany, Italy, Japan, Portugal, Canada The PM is answerable to the legislature
Semi presidential A President and a Prime Minister both exist, and the President has real powers France, Russia, Sri Lanka Executive power is shared

Two refinements help in match the column questions. Canada is a parliamentary democracy with a constitutional monarchy: the monarch is the formal head of state while the PM governs. In Germany the President is ceremonial and the Chancellor is the head of government.

Beyond the textbook. For the exam: Sri Lanka introduced an executive presidency in 1978, with a directly elected President who can be removed only through Parliament by a two thirds majority. In reality: the details of the Sri Lankan system have been amended since then. The term of the President, which the textbook gives as six years, has since been shortened to five. Why it matters: if an exam question cites the six year term, answer from the textbook; if it is a current affairs question, expect the revised rule.

Why India chose the parliamentary system

Indians had practical experience of a limited form of parliamentary government under the Acts of 1919 and 1935. The framers were also wary of a presidential system, where a single powerful person could develop a personality cult. They wanted an executive that the legislature could control and remove if it lost the confidence of the people's representatives.

The result: at the Union level the President is the formal head of state and the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers are the real executive. The States copy this: the Governor is the formal head and the Chief Minister and Council of Ministers are the real executive.

Two views. For the exam: India chose the parliamentary system for accountability and because of the experience of Acts of 1919 and 1935. Another reading: scholars point out the trade off. Supporters of the parliamentary system say it makes the government answerable to the elected House every day and allows a quick change of government. Supporters of a presidential system argue that a fixed term gives more stability and that a President directly chosen by the people can govern without needing to keep a coalition together. The framers weighed both options and chose answerability.

The President

How the President is elected. Indirectly, for five years, by an electoral college of elected Members of Parliament and elected Members of the State Legislative Assemblies, using proportional representation with the single transferable vote. This means a President is chosen by representatives and not directly by voters. The President can be removed before the end of the term only through impeachment by Parliament for violating the Constitution.

How much real power? Article 74(1) says there shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid and advise the President, and the President shall act in accordance with that advice. Through the 42nd and 44th Amendments, the President can ask the Council to reconsider its advice once, but must accept the advice it gives the second time.

Why this arrangement exists. The Prime Minister and ministers are elected by the people and answerable to the Lok Sabha. If the President could overrule them, an unelected office would hold the real power. Article 74(1) makes sure that the elected side makes the decisions and the President represents the whole state.

The President's three discretions. Even so, there are three situations where the President has some room for personal judgment.

Situation What the President can do Limit
Advice from the Council of Ministers Send it back for reconsideration Only once; the reconsidered advice is binding
A bill passed by Parliament (not a Money Bill) Withhold assent or return it for reconsideration If Parliament passes it again, the President must sign. No time limit is fixed for acting, which allows a pocket veto
A hung Lok Sabha, where no party or alliance has a clear majority Use judgment in choosing the Prime Minister Must invite the person most likely to command a majority

The pocket veto in a sentence. The Constitution does not say how long the President may take to decide on a bill. So a bill can be left unsigned indefinitely: it is neither approved nor rejected. In 1986 President Zail Singh did this with the Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill.

The hung Lok Sabha in a sentence. In 1998 no party or alliance had a clear majority. President K. R. Narayanan insisted that the leader invited to form the government show that he had the support of a majority before he was sworn in as Prime Minister.

Pause and predict: the Council of Ministers sends the President advice, the President asks for it to be reconsidered, and the Council sends back the same advice. Must the President accept it? What if he asks again?

Check your answer: Yes, he must accept it, and he cannot ask a second time. Article 74(1) and the amendments allow only one request for reconsideration.

The Vice-President

Feature President Vice-President
Electoral college Elected MPs and elected MLAs Members of both Houses of Parliament only
Term Five years Five years
Removal Impeachment by Parliament for violating the Constitution Resolution of the Rajya Sabha agreed to by the Lok Sabha
Other role Head of state Ex officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha; acts as President only until a new President is elected

The standard example of an acting President is B. D. Jatti, who held the office in 1977 after the death of President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed.

The Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers

Appointment. The President appoints the Prime Minister, who must be a leader with the support of the majority in the Lok Sabha. The other ministers are appointed on the Prime Minister's advice. The Prime Minister decides each minister's rank (Cabinet, Minister of State or Deputy Minister) and portfolio.

The six month rule. A person who is not a member of either House can be made a minister or Prime Minister, but must be elected to Parliament within six months.

The 91st Amendment, 2003. Before this, a Prime Minister or Chief Minister could keep a majority by offering ministerial posts to as many supporters as needed. The amendment limits the whole Council of Ministers, including the Prime Minister, to 15% of the total membership of the Lok Sabha. States have the same cap in relation to the strength of the Assembly.

Question Answer
What is capped? The size of the Council of Ministers
At what level? 15% of Lok Sabha members (and of Assembly members for States)
Which amendment? 91st, 2003
Why? To stop support being bought through ministerial posts

Collective responsibility. The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha. In practice:

Event Result
A no-confidence motion passes against one minister The whole Council must resign
One minister resigns, dies or is dismissed Only a vacancy arises
The Prime Minister dies or resigns The Council dissolves
The Rajya Sabha criticises the government The government continues, because it is not answerable to that House

The principle means ministers must back each other in public, once a decision is made in the Council. If a minister disagrees strongly, the honourable course is to resign. Jawaharlal Nehru called the Prime Minister the linchpin of the government, the link joining the Council of Ministers, the President and Parliament. The Prime Minister must also tell the President every decision of the Council.

Cause and effect: coalitions. When no party wins a majority on its own, the leader who becomes Prime Minister has to bargain with allies. That has made the PM more of a negotiator and widened the room for the President's judgment in a hung House. It also made the cap on ministers necessary, because bargaining often means ministerial posts.

The permanent executive: the bureaucracy

Ministers come and go, but the Ministry carries on. That is the role of the permanent executive: trained civil servants who assist ministers in framing and carrying out policy.

Feature Detail
Recruitment UPSC for All India and Central services, State Public Service Commissions for State services
Expected attitude Politically neutral: serve whichever government is in office
Representation Reservations for SC, ST, OBC, women and economically weaker sections
IAS and IPS Appointed by the Centre, serve in the States, and only the Centre can take disciplinary action against them
Accountability tool Right to Information makes the bureaucracy more answerable

Why the Centre controls IAS and IPS. These services serve in the States but are common to the whole country. Central control keeps a uniform standard, and also gives the Centre a link into State administration.

Two views. For the exam: civil servants must be politically neutral and serve any government. Another reading: writers on public administration debate what neutrality means. Some argue that neutrality does not require indifference: an elected government is entitled to expect officers to carry out its programme faithfully. Others warn that if officers become committed to a particular political line, the neutrality that protects citizens is lost. The textbook position is neutrality, and that is the one to give in an exam.

Timeline and key terms

Year Event Why it mattered
1919 and 1935 Acts giving limited representative government Gave Indians experience of the parliamentary form
1977 B. D. Jatti acts as President Example of the Vice-President acting
1978 Executive presidency in Sri Lanka Example of a semi presidential system
1986 Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill Example of the pocket veto
1998 Hung Lok Sabha President's discretion in choosing the Prime Minister
2003 91st Amendment 15% cap on the Council of Ministers
Term Meaning
Aid and advice The Council's role under Article 74(1); binding on the President
Pocket veto Leaving a bill unsigned with no time limit
Hung Lok Sabha No party or alliance has a clear majority
Collective responsibility The Council sinks or swims together
Linchpin Nehru's term for the Prime Minister's role

Exam traps

The trap Why it's tempting The truth
"MLAs vote in the Vice-President's election." They vote for the President Only members of both Houses of Parliament
"The President can ask for reconsideration repeatedly." A power sounds permanent Only once; the second time he must accept
"The pocket veto covers Money Bills." All bills seem equal Not Money Bills
"The Council is responsible to both Houses." Parliament has two Houses Only the Lok Sabha
"The 15% cap came from the 42nd Amendment." That amendment changed advice rules 91st Amendment, 2003
"France and Sri Lanka are parliamentary." They have a Prime Minister They are semi presidential
"The PM must lead the largest single party." The largest party usually leads The leader who commands majority support
"A State can discipline IAS officers working in it." They work for the State Only the Centre can

60-second revision

Topic Lock this in
Types Presidential (USA), Parliamentary (UK, Germany, Canada), Semi presidential (France, Russia, Sri Lanka)
President's election Elected MPs plus elected MLAs, STV, five years
Vice-President Both Houses of Parliament only, Chairman of Rajya Sabha
Article 74(1) Aid and advice binding, one reconsideration only
Discretions Reconsideration, pocket veto, PM in a hung House
Collective responsibility Council answers to the Lok Sabha
91st Amendment 15% cap, 2003
Non MP minister Must be elected within six months
Bureaucracy UPSC and State PSCs, neutral, IAS and IPS under Central discipline

Where this chapter connects

🎯 Practice MCQs

First 3 questions free · create a free account to unlock the rest — answers & explanations included, no payment needed

Q1. The Council of Ministers in India is collectively responsible to

▸ Show answer & explanation

Answer: C

The Council of Ministers answers to the Lok Sabha, and a government that loses its confidence must resign. The Rajya Sabha can criticise the government but cannot remove it.

Q2. The 91st Constitutional Amendment, 2003 provides that the Council of Ministers shall not exceed

▸ Show answer & explanation

Answer: C

The cap is 15 per cent of the total membership of the Lok Sabha, or of the Assembly in a State. It was made to discourage buying support through ministerial posts.

Q3. Consider the following statements about the President's discretion. I. The President may ask the Council of Ministers to reconsider its advice, but must act on the reconsidered advice. II. The President can withhold assent indefinitely to a Money Bill. III. The President uses judgment in choosing the Prime Minister when no party or alliance has a clear majority. Which statements are correct?

▸ Show answer & explanation

Answer: C

Statements I and III are correct. Statement II is wrong because the pocket veto applies to bills other than Money Bills.

🔒 9 more practice MCQs

Create a free account to unlock every MCQ in this chapter — answers and explanations included. No payment needed.

Already registered? Just log in and they'll all appear here.

📊 Previous-Year Questions

Practise with real CUET Political Science previous-year papers — every question solved, with the correct answer and a step-by-step explanation.

View solved CUET PYQ papers →

Ready to drill Political Science?

Unlock all MCQs, chapter tests, mocks & PYQs for ₹199/year.

Get UniDrill Pro