📌 Snapshot
- The Harappan (Indus Valley) Civilisation was a Bronze Age urban culture whose Mature phase ran c. 2600–1900 BCE, known primarily through archaeology rather than texts (script remains undeciphered).
- Standard CUET vocabulary: Citadel/Lower Town, planned drainage, Great Bath, steatite seals, faience, chert weights, Meluhha/Magan/Dilmun.
- The archaeological method developed through a clear sequence: Cunningham → Daya Ram Sahni → Rakhal Das Banerji → John Marshall (1924 announcement) → R.E.M. Wheeler (stratigraphy) → recent Rakhigarhi DNA work.
- Open problems CUET loves to test: decline (c. 1800 BCE), authority (single state vs multiple rulers vs equality), religion (Great Bath, "proto-Shiva", mother goddesses).
📖 Detailed Notes
2.1 Core concepts
- Terminology and time-span: The Harappan Civilisation, named after Harappa where it was first identified, is also called the Indus Valley Civilisation; total span c. 6000 BCE–1300 BCE divided into Early Harappan (6000–2600 BCE), Mature Harappan (2600–1900 BCE, urban) and Late Harappan (1900–1300 BCE, decadent) (NCERT §Terminologies, p. 1).
- Geographical spread: Distinctive Harappan pottery, baked/unbaked bricks, seals, weights, beads and copper/bronze articles are found across Afghanistan, Baluchistan, Sind, Punjab (Pakistan) and Indian states of J&K, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, UP, Gujarat and Maharashtra (NCERT §Terminologies, p. 1; Map 1, p. 2).
- Number of sites and five major cities: Over 2000 Harappan sites have been discovered; nearly two-thirds lie in the Saraswati basin; five major cities are Rakhigarhi, Mohenjodaro, Harappa, Dholavira and Ganweriwala (NCERT §Harappan Settlements box, p. 2).
- Subsistence — crops: Grains found at sites include wheat, barley, lentil, chickpea and sesame; millets appear at Gujarat sites; rice finds are relatively rare (NCERT §2, pp. 2–3).
- Subsistence — animals: Bones of domesticated cattle, sheep, goat, buffalo and pig; also wild boar, deer and gharial, plus fish and fowl; whether Harappans hunted or obtained meat from hunting communities is uncertain (NCERT §2, p. 3).
- Agricultural technology: Bull representations on seals and terracotta plus terracotta plough models from Cholistan and Banawali (Haryana) suggest ox-drawn ploughing; a ploughed field with two sets of furrows at right angles was found at Kalibangan (Rajasthan), indicating two crops grown together; canals at Shortughai (Afghanistan), wells, and Dholavira water reservoirs imply irrigation in semi-arid lands (NCERT §2.1, pp. 3–4).
- Mohenjodaro layout: Settlement is divided into a smaller but higher Citadel (walled, built on mud-brick platforms) and a larger but lower Lower Town (also walled, with buildings on platforms); platform construction alone is estimated at four million person-days (NCERT §3, pp. 5–6).
- Standardised bricks: Sun-dried or baked bricks across all Harappan settlements followed a uniform ratio — length and breadth four times and twice the height respectively (NCERT §3, p. 6).
- Drainage: Streets and drains were laid out first along an approximate grid pattern intersecting at right angles, then houses built along them; every house was connected to street drains; main channels were brick-set in mortar with loose-brick (sometimes limestone) covers for cleaning; house drains emptied into sumps/cesspits; drains were also found at smaller settlements like Lothal (NCERT §3.1, pp. 6–7).
- Domestic architecture: Houses centred on a courtyard, no ground-floor windows on outer walls, main entrance not giving direct view of interior, every house had its own brick-paved bathroom, many had staircases and wells; Mohenjodaro had about 700 wells (NCERT §3.2, p. 7).
- Citadel structures: Citadel held the warehouse and the Great Bath — a large rectangular tank in a courtyard surrounded by a corridor; two flights of steps on north and south, made watertight with bricks set on edge and gypsum mortar; a smaller building to its north had eight bathrooms; the Great Bath was probably meant for a special ritual bath (NCERT §3.3, p. 8).
- Citadel variations: At Dholavira and Lothal the entire settlement was fortified with internal walls; Lothal's Citadel was not walled off but built at a height (NCERT §Citadels box, p. 6).
- Burials: Dead were generally laid in pits, sometimes brick-lined; some graves contained pottery, ornaments (jewellery for both sexes), and occasionally copper mirrors; an ornament of three shell rings, a jasper bead and hundreds of micro beads was found near a male skull at Harappa cemetery; overall Harappans did not bury precious things with the dead (NCERT §4.1, p. 9).
- Luxuries and hoards: Utilitarian objects (querns, pottery, needles, flesh-rubbers) are distributed throughout settlements; luxuries (rare/non-local/complex-tech objects like faience pots) and gold jewellery (all from hoards) concentrate in large settlements like Mohenjodaro and Harappa (NCERT §4.2, pp. 9–10).
- Craft production at Chanhudaro: A tiny site (under 7 hectares vs Mohenjodaro 125 ha) almost exclusively devoted to bead-making, shell-cutting, metal-working, seal-making and weight-making (NCERT §5, p. 10).
- Bead materials and techniques: Carnelian, jasper, crystal, quartz, steatite, copper, bronze, gold, shell, faience, terracotta; steatite was soft, easily worked, and could be moulded as paste — steatite micro beads remain a technological puzzle; carnelian's red colour was obtained by firing yellowish raw material; specialised drills at Chanhudaro, Lothal and Dholavira; Nageshwar and Balakot specialised in shell objects (NCERT §5, pp. 10–11).
- Procuring materials: Locally available clay; outside materials included stone, timber and metal; transport by bullock carts (terracotta models), riverine routes along Indus/tributaries, coastal routes; Harappans established settlements at raw-material sources — Nageshwar/Balakot (shell), Shortughai (Afghanistan, lapis lazuli), Lothal (carnelian from Bharuch, steatite from south Rajasthan and north Gujarat, metal from Rajasthan); expeditions to Khetri (copper) and south India (gold); Ganeshwar-Jodhpura culture probably supplied copper (NCERT §6 & §6.1, p. 12).
- Long-distance trade: Copper probably also from Oman — both Omani and Harappan artefacts contain nickel; a Harappan jar with black clay coating found in Oman; Mesopotamian texts refer to copper from Magan (probably Oman) and mention Dilmun (Bahrain), Magan and Meluhha (Harappan region); Meluhha exported carnelian, lapis lazuli, copper, gold and varieties of wood; communication probably by sea; Dilmun weights followed the Harappan standard; depictions of boats appear on seals (NCERT §6.2, pp. 13–14).
- Seals and sealings: Seals/sealings facilitated long-distance communication — a bag's knot was sealed with wet clay impressed by seal(s); intact sealing meant the bag was untampered and identified the sender (NCERT §7.1, p. 15).
- Script: Harappan seals usually carry a line of writing (probably name + title); script is undeciphered, not alphabetical (375–400 signs, too many for an alphabet); written right-to-left (wider spacing on right, cramping on left); longest inscription has about 26 signs; writing also on copper tools, rims of jars, copper/terracotta tablets, jewellery, bone rods, and an ancient signboard at Dholavira (NCERT §7.2, p. 15).
- Weights: Usually made of chert, generally cubical with no markings; lower denominations binary (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32) and higher decimal (160, 200, 320, 640); metal scale-pans also found (NCERT §7.3, pp. 15–16).
- Authority — evidence: Extraordinary uniformity of pottery, seals, weights and bricks (same ratio from Jammu to Gujarat), strategic location of settlements and large-scale labour mobilisation suggest complex decision-making (NCERT §8, p. 16).
- Authority — theories: A large building at Mohenjodaro was labelled a "palace" but had no spectacular finds; a stone statue is called the "priest-king" by parallel with Mesopotamia; competing views — (a) no rulers, everyone equal; (b) several rulers, one per city; (c) a single state — supported by uniformity and planning; possibly some form of democratic system (NCERT §8.1, pp. 16–17).
- Decline: By c. 1800 BCE most Mature Harappan sites in regions like Cholistan were abandoned; simultaneous expansion into Gujarat, Haryana and western UP; in surviving Late Harappan sites — disappearance of weights, seals, special beads, writing, long-distance trade, craft specialisation; deteriorating house construction; rural "successor cultures"; suggested causes — climatic change, deforestation, excessive floods, shifting/drying rivers, overuse of landscape; none alone explains civilisation-wide collapse; the unifying element (perhaps the Harappan state) ended (NCERT §9, p. 17).
- Discovery — Cunningham: Alexander Cunningham, first Director-General of the ASI, in 1875 noted that bricks taken by robbers from Harappa were enough to lay tracks for "about 100 miles" of Lahore-Multan railway; he failed to grasp the seal's age because his framework relied on Chinese Buddhist pilgrim accounts and assumed Indian history began with Ganga-valley cities (NCERT §The plight of Harappa box, p. 6; §10.1, p. 19).
- Discovery — Sahni, Banerji, Marshall: Daya Ram Sahni found seals at Harappa in older layers in the early 20th century; Rakhal Das Banerji found similar seals at Mohenjodaro; in 1924 John Marshall (Director-General, ASI) announced the new Indus civilisation, contemporaneous with Mesopotamia ("Marshall left India three thousand years older than he had found her"); Marshall excavated by horizontal units, ignoring stratigraphy (NCERT §10.2, p. 20).
- Discovery — Wheeler: R.E.M. Wheeler became Director-General in 1944 and rectified the stratigraphy problem; ex-army brigadier; in 1947 he tried to link Mohenjodaro skeletons with the Rigveda (Indra as puramdara the fort-destroyer) — "On circumstantial evidence, Indra stands accused"; George Dales (1960s) demonstrated the skeletons were not from one period, debunking the "Mohenjodaro massacre" (NCERT Source 3, p. 18; §10.3, p. 21).
- Discovery — post-Partition Indian sites: Kalibangan, Lothal, Rakhi Garhi and Dholavira have been discovered/excavated since 1947; specialists from subcontinent and abroad now jointly work at Harappa and Mohenjodaro using modern scientific techniques (NCERT §10.3, p. 21).
- Recent archaeogenetics — Rakhigarhi: The biggest Harappan city (550 ha) in Hisar district, Haryana; DNA extracted from skeletons by Deccan College Pune with CCMB Hyderabad and Harvard Medical College; indicates Harappans are indigenous, genetic roots to 10,000 BCE, no large-scale Aryan immigration, unbroken 5000-year continuity; reconstructed 3D facial features resemble modern Haryana population (NCERT Source 3, p. 18).
- Religion and interpretation: Terracotta figurines of women with head-dresses interpreted as mother goddesses; the "priest-king" statue; Great Bath and fire altars at Kalibangan and Lothal assigned ritual significance; "proto-Shiva" seal of a cross-legged figure surrounded by animals — but in Rigveda, Rudra is neither Pashupati nor a yogi, so the figure may be a shaman; conical stones classified as lingas may have been gamesmen (Mackay) (NCERT §11.2, pp. 23–24).
2.2 Definitions to memorise
| Term | Definition | Page |
|---|---|---|
| BP | Before Present | 2 |
| BCE | Before Common Era | 2 |
| CE | Common Era | 2 |
| c. | Latin circa, "approximate" | 2 |
| Mature Harappan | The urban phase 2600–1900 BCE — the most prosperous phase | 1 |
| Citadel | The smaller but higher walled section of Harappan cities, built on mud-brick platforms | 6 |
| Lower Town | The larger but lower walled residential section | 5–6 |
| Faience | A material of ground sand/silica mixed with colour and gum, then fired — used for "luxury" pots | 9 |
| Hoards | Objects (jewellery or metal) kept by people in containers, never retrieved, later found by archaeologists | 10 |
| Sealing | Wet clay impressed by a seal on a knot to certify untampered goods and identify the sender | 15 |
| Chert | The stone, usually cubical and unmarked, from which Harappan weights were made | 15 |
| Magan | Mesopotamian name for a copper source — probably Oman | 13 |
| Meluhha | Mesopotamian name probably for the Harappan region; exported carnelian, lapis lazuli, copper, gold, wood | 14 |
| Dilmun | Mesopotamian name probably for Bahrain; its weights followed the Harappan standard | 14 |
| Mound | Build-up of occupational debris from repeated use/reuse of a landscape | 20 |
| Stratigraphy | Study of layers of an archaeological site, used to assign artefacts to cultural periods | 20 |
| Sterile layers | Layers of abandonment/desertion, identified by absence of cultural traces | 20 |
| Archaeogenetics | Study of DNA of ancient population using molecular genetics | 19 |
| Linga | A polished stone worshipped as a symbol of Shiva | 23 |
| Shaman | Men/women claiming magical and healing powers and ability to communicate with the other world | 24 |
2.3 Diagrams / processes to remember
- Fig. 1.1 — Harappan seal: Steatite, with animal motif and undeciphered script; the most distinctive Harappan artefact (p. 1).
- Map 1 — Mature Harappan sites: Locations of Harappa, Mohenjodaro, Kalibangan, Banawali, Rakhigarhi, Dholavira, Lothal, Sutkagendor, Chanhudaro, Nageshwar, Balakot (p. 2).
- Fig. 1.5 — Reservoir at Dholavira: Masonry water reservoir — evidence for water storage in semi-arid lands (p. 4).
- Fig. 1.7 — Layout of Mohenjodaro: Citadel (smaller, higher, west) and Lower Town (larger, lower, east) on grid pattern (p. 5).
- Fig. 1.9 — Isometric drawing of a large Mohenjodaro house: Courtyard plan with well in room 6 (p. 7).
- Fig. 1.10 — Plan of the Citadel: Shows Great Bath, warehouse and associated structures (p. 8).
- Map 3 — Harappan civilisation and West Asia: Shows Mesopotamia (Uruk, Ur), Dilmun, Magan, Meluhha, Shortughai, Sutkagendor, Lothal — the long-distance trade network (p. 13).
- Fig. 1.23 — "Priest-king": Stone statue, seated, named by parallel with Mesopotamian priest-kings (p. 16).
- Fig. 1.27 — "Proto-Shiva" seal: Cross-legged figure surrounded by animals (p. 23).
- Timeline 2 — Major developments in Harappan archaeology: 1875 Cunningham; 1921 Sahni at Harappa; 1922 Mohenjodaro begins; 1946 Wheeler at Harappa; 1955 S.R. Rao at Lothal; 1960 B.B. Lal & B.K. Thapar at Kalibangan; 1990 R.S. Bisht at Dholavira; 1997 Amrendra Nath at Rakhigarhi; 2013 Vasant Shinde's archaeogenetic research (p. 25).
2.5 Timeline / Key events
| Year / Period | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| c. 6000–2600 BCE | Early Harappan phase | Pre-urban settlements (NCERT §1.1, p. 1) |
| c. 2600–1900 BCE | Mature Harappan phase | Urbanism, planned cities, script, seals (NCERT §1.1, p. 1) |
| c. 1900–1300 BCE | Late Harappan phase | De-urbanisation; regionalisation (NCERT §1.1, p. 1) |
| c. 1900 BCE | Major Mature-Harappan cities abandoned | Onset of decline (NCERT §1.9, p. 24) |
| 1875 CE | Alexander Cunningham, first DG of ASI, publishes the Harappan seal | First scholarly notice (NCERT §1.7.1, p. 17) |
| 1921 CE | Daya Ram Sahni excavates Harappa | Beginning of Harappan archaeology (NCERT §1.7.2, p. 18) |
| 1922 CE | Rakhal Das Banerji excavates Mohenjodaro | Twin-site discovery (NCERT p. 18) |
| 1924 CE | John Marshall announces discovery of the Indus Valley Civilisation | Worldwide recognition (NCERT p. 18) |
| 1944 CE | R.E.M. Wheeler appointed DG ASI; introduces stratigraphic method | Modern excavation technique (NCERT §1.7.3, p. 19) |
| 1946 CE | Wheeler re-excavates Harappa | (NCERT timeline 2, p. 25) |
| 1955 CE | S.R. Rao excavates Lothal (Gujarat) | Coastal port, dockyard hypothesis (NCERT p. 25) |
| 1960 CE | B.B. Lal & B.K. Thapar excavate Kalibangan (Rajasthan) | Early & Mature Harappan layers (NCERT p. 25) |
| 1960s | George Dales refutes Wheeler's "massacre at Mohenjodaro" thesis | (NCERT p. 24) |
| 1990 CE | R.S. Bisht excavates Dholavira (Gujarat) | Reservoirs, large signboard (NCERT p. 25) |
| 1997 CE | Amrendra Nath begins work at Rakhigarhi (Haryana) | Largest Harappan site (NCERT p. 25) |
| 2013 CE | Vasant Shinde's team begins archaeogenetic research at Rakhigarhi | DNA evidence on Harappan population (NCERT p. 25) |
| 2019 CE | Shinde et al. publish — Harappans not from steppe ancestry | Reframes origins debate (NCERT p. 24) |
2.4 Common confusions / NTA trap points
- Phase dates: Early Harappan 6000–2600 BCE, Mature 2600–1900 BCE, Late 1900–1300 BCE. NTA often swaps "Mature" with "Late" or shifts the 1900 BCE boundary.
- Five major cities: Rakhigarhi, Mohenjodaro, Harappa, Dholavira, Ganweriwala. Kalibangan, Lothal, Chanhudaro and Banawali are NOT among the five — they appear as distractors.
- Citadel vs Lower Town: Citadel = smaller, higher, west; Lower Town = larger, lower, east. Both were walled at Mohenjodaro. At Dholavira/Lothal the whole settlement was fortified; Lothal's Citadel was built at a height but not walled off.
- Weights system: Lower denominations are binary (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32), higher are decimal (160, 200, 320, 640) — material is chert. NTA may flip "binary/decimal" between high and low.
- Brick ratio: Length:breadth:height = 4:2:1 (i.e., length = 4× height, breadth = 2× height) — uniform across all sites.
- Discovery sequence: Cunningham noted a seal (1875) but missed its age → Sahni excavated Harappa (1921) → Banerji at Mohenjodaro → Marshall announced (1924) → Wheeler corrected stratigraphy (1944). Don't confuse Marshall (announcer) with Cunningham (first DG ASI).
- Magan / Meluhha / Dilmun: Magan = Oman (copper), Meluhha = Harappan region, Dilmun = Bahrain. Frequently mixed up in match-the-following.
- "Mohenjodaro massacre": Proposed by Wheeler ("On circumstantial evidence, Indra stands accused"); refuted by George Dales in the 1960s.
🎯 Practice MCQs
First 3 questions free · create a free account to unlock the rest — answers & explanations included, no payment needed
Q1. The Mature Harappan phase of the Indus Valley Civilisation is dated to:
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Mature Harappan is 2600 BCE–1900 BCE, the urban and most prosperous phase. (A) is Early Harappan; (C) is Late Harappan.
Q2. Which of the following is **NOT** counted among the five major cities of the Harappan Civilisation?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The five major cities listed are Rakhigarhi, Mohenjodaro, Harappa, Dholavira and Ganweriwala. Kalibangan is a Harappan site but not among the five majors.
Q3. Evidence of a ploughed field with two sets of furrows at right angles to each other, suggesting two crops grown together, was found at:
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
The ploughed field was found at Kalibangan in Rajasthan, associated with Early Harappan levels. Terracotta plough models — not the field itself — are from Cholistan and Banawali.
🔒 12 more practice MCQs
Create a free account to unlock every MCQ in this chapter — answers and explanations included. No payment needed.
Already registered? Just log in and they'll all appear here.
Q4. Consider the following statements about Harappan bricks: 1. Whether sun-dried or baked, they were of a standardised ratio. 2. The length and breadth were four times and twice the height respectively. 3. The same brick ratio is found at Harappan settlements from Jammu to Gujarat. Which of the statements is/are correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
All three statements are explicitly affirmed, and together they form the argument for centralised authority.
Q5. The Great Bath at Mohenjodaro was made watertight by:
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The tank was made watertight "by setting bricks on edge and using a mortar of gypsum". The other materials are not mentioned for the Great Bath.
Q6. Match the site with what it is best known for: | Site | Feature | |---|---| | 1. Chanhudaro | i. Water reservoirs | | 2. Nageshwar / Balakot | ii. Shell-object specialisation | | 3. Dholavira | iii. Almost exclusively craft production | | 4. Shortughai | iv. Near best source of lapis lazuli |
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Chanhudaro was a tiny site devoted to craft production; Nageshwar and Balakot were specialised centres for shell objects; Dholavira's water reservoirs are noted in §2.1; Shortughai was established in Afghanistan near the best source of lapis lazuli.
Q7. In the Harappan system of weights, the lower denominations followed which numerical system, and what material were the weights generally made of?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Weights were usually made of chert and generally cubical with no markings; lower denominations were binary (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32) and only the higher denominations followed the decimal system (160, 200, 320, 640).
Q8. Mesopotamian texts refer to copper coming from a region called **Magan**. It is identified with:
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Magan is described as "perhaps a name for Oman". Dilmun is associated with Bahrain and Meluhha with the Harappan region.
Q9. Which of the following is **NOT** as evidence of long-distance contact between the Harappans and Mesopotamia?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
The evidence is nickel-in-copper, the black-coated jar in Oman, and Harappan seals/weights/dice/beads. It never claims cuneiform Harappan tablets at Ur — the script remains undeciphered.
Q10. About the Harappan script, which statement is correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The script is not alphabetical because it has too many signs (375–400) and was written right-to-left, evident from wider spacing on the right and cramping on the left. It remains undeciphered.
Q11. **Assertion (A):** Wheeler argued that the destruction of the Indus civilisation was caused by an Aryan invasion led by Indra. **Reason (R):** Sixteen skeletons with ornaments were found at Mohenjodaro in 1925, and Wheeler correlated the Rigvedic *puramdara* (fort-destroyer) with the citadels.
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Wheeler, citing Rigvedic *pur*/Indra-as-*puramdara* and the Mohenjodaro skeletons, wrote "On circumstantial evidence, Indra stands accused" — R directly explains A. (George Dales later refuted the massacre theory, but the assertion correctly describes Wheeler's argument.)
Q12. Who announced the discovery of the Indus Valley Civilisation to the world in 1924?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Marshall, then DG of the ASI, announced the new civilisation in 1924 after Sahni's Harappa finds and Banerji's Mohenjodaro finds. Cunningham (1875) failed to date the seal he received.
Q13. Which of the following pairs is correctly matched?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Wheeler recognised the need to follow the stratigraphy of the mound rather than dig along uniform horizontal lines. Sahni excavated Harappa (not Mohenjodaro); Cunningham was the first DG; R.S. Bisht began Dholavira excavations in 1990, while S.R. Rao excavated Lothal from 1955.
Q14. Consider the following statements about the decline of the Harappan Civilisation: 1. By c. 1800 BCE most Mature Harappan sites in regions such as Cholistan had been abandoned. 2. In the few sites that continued after 1900 BCE, weights, seals and special beads disappeared. 3. The standardised weight system was replaced by local weights. 4. The collapse can be explained completely by climatic change alone. Which of the statements are correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Statements 1, 2 and 3 are stated directly. Statement 4 is false — Climatic change, deforestation, floods, drying rivers, etc., "may hold for certain settlements, but they do not explain the collapse of the entire civilisation".
Q15. The recent archaeogenetic research at **Rakhigarhi** (Vasant Shinde et al., 2019), concluded that:
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The Rakhigarhi DNA work concluded that the Harappans are indigenous, that their genes continue today in the majority of the South Asian population, and that "continuity without any break…rules out large scale immigration of the so-called Aryans".
📊 Previous-Year Questions
Practise with real CUET History previous-year papers — every question solved, with the correct answer and a step-by-step explanation.
View solved CUET PYQ papers →Ready to drill History?
Unlock all MCQs, chapter tests, mocks & PYQs for ₹199/year.
Get UniDrill Pro