📌 Snapshot
- Why Article 1 says Union of States, who controls what, and how India balances unity with diversity.
- The Union, State and Concurrent Lists with the traps NTA sets, and why the Centre is strong.
- Governors, Article 356, new States, border and river disputes, with years in a timeline.
- Special provisions for the north east and the end of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, explained factually.
📖 Detailed Notes
Written and reviewed by Subhra Gupta, Humanities faculty at UniDrill (M.A. Sociology, University of Delhi · 7 years teaching Humanities). Based on NCERT Political Science Class XI (Indian Constitution at Work), Chapter 7.
Why does the Constitution say "Union of States" and not "federation"?
Article 1 begins: "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States." The word "federation" does not appear in the Constitution at all. A country as large and varied as India has a problem that no single government can handle well: it needs one voice on defence and currency, and many voices on local needs such as farming, policing and health. Federalism is the arrangement that tries to do both. This chapter explains how India built it, where the Centre is stronger than the States, and where the arrangement has been tested.
What federalism means
Federalism is an institutional arrangement that accommodates two sets of polities, one regional and one national, each autonomous in its own sphere. A person in a federation has two identities. You are a Gujarati or a Jharkhandi and also an Indian.
| Feature of a federation | How it works in India |
|---|---|
| Two levels of government | Union and State, each with constitutional status |
| A written, supreme Constitution | The source of power for both; it lists their subjects |
| Division of powers | Subjects of national concern go to the Centre, regional and local matters to the States |
| An independent judiciary | Settles Centre and State disputes about the division of powers |
| Citizenship | India has single citizenship, unlike federations with dual citizenship |
The textbook adds that no constitution can make federalism work alone. It needs a culture of trust, cooperation, mutual respect and restraint. When one unit or group dominates, it creates resentment, secessionist demands and in the worst case civil war.
The division of powers: three Lists
The Seventh Schedule divides subjects into three Lists. This table is the most frequently quoted visual in the chapter.
| List | Who can legislate | Sample subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Union List | Parliament | Defence, atomic energy, foreign affairs, war and peace, banking, railways, post and telegraph, airways, ports, foreign trade, currency and coinage |
| State List | State legislatures (normally) | Agriculture, police, prisons, local government, public health, land, liquor, trade and commerce, livestock and animal husbandry, State public services |
| Concurrent List | Both Parliament and State legislatures | Education, transfer of property other than agricultural land, forests, trade unions, adulteration, adoption and succession |
| Residuary | Only Parliament | Any subject not in the three Lists, with Cyber Laws as an example |
Why the Centre gets the residuary subjects. Anything new that nobody listed, such as a new technology, falls to the Union. This keeps the Centre able to act on new national concerns, and it is one of the signs of a strong centre.
Beyond the textbook. For the exam: Education and Forests are in the Concurrent List. In reality: both were in the State List at first. The 42nd Amendment (1976) moved them to the Concurrent List. Why it matters: a question may ask who could make laws on education in 1950 and who can now. The answer changes.
Pause and predict: a brand new technology appears that is not listed in any of the three Lists. Who has the power to make laws on it?
Check your answer: Parliament. Residuary powers belong to the Union.
Why the Constitution has a strong Centre
India is a country of continental size and great diversity. At independence, more than 500 princely states had to be brought into the Union alongside the provinces formed by the British. The makers feared that a loose arrangement might break apart, so they chose a federal system with a strong central government.
| Feature | What it does |
|---|---|
| Power over States | Parliament alone can form a new State, unite States or change a State's boundary or name (Article 3). It must take the view of the State legislature, but need not follow it |
| Emergency provisions | In an Emergency, the federal system can work as a more centralised one, and Parliament can legislate on State List subjects |
| Finances | The main sources of revenue are with the Centre. The Union uses discretion in grants and loans. The Planning Commission, since replaced by NITI Aayog, used to centralise planning |
| Governor | Appointed by the Centre; can recommend dismissal of the State government and reserve State bills for the President |
| Rajya Sabha | Can enable Parliament to legislate on a State subject |
| Article 257(1) | The executive power of the Union is superior to that of the States, and the Union can give directions to the States |
| All India Services | IAS and IPS officers serve in the States but are under central control: the State cannot take disciplinary action against them |
| Articles 33 and 34 | Let Parliament restrict certain rights of the armed forces and protect persons acting in martial law |
Two views. For the exam: India is a federation with a strong Centre, designed to hold a diverse country together. Another reading: some scholars argue that this is what makes India a "quasi federal" system, where the Centre can override the States in many ways. Others maintain that India is a distinct kind of federation, adapted to its history, in which strong central powers coexist with real State governments and a Supreme Court that settles disputes. Both views agree on the facts in the table above. They differ on what to call the result.
How Indian federalism has worked: three phases
| Period | Character | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1950s to early 1960s | Cooperative federalism under Nehru | One party was in power at the Centre and in most States, so disputes were resolved within the party |
| From the mid 1960s | Demands for autonomy grow | Opposition parties came to power in several States and challenged central control |
| From the 1990s | "Mature federalism" in the coalition era | Coalition governments gave States more say in national decisions |
Demands for autonomy have taken four forms.
| Form | What is demanded |
|---|---|
| Powers | More subjects for the States |
| Financial | Independent sources of revenue |
| Administrative | Greater control over how policy is carried out |
| Cultural and linguistic | Protection of language and culture, such as opposition to the imposition of Hindi in Tamil Nadu and the demand for the advancement of Punjabi in Punjab |
Governors and President's Rule
The Governor is appointed by the Centre and is not elected, so the role has often been debated. The Sarkaria Commission on Centre and State relations was appointed in 1983 and submitted its report in 1988. It recommended that Governors should be appointed in a strictly non partisan way.
Article 356 says that the President can impose President's Rule in a State if its government cannot be carried on in accordance with the Constitution. The proclamation must be approved by Parliament, and it can continue for up to three years. Until 1967 it was used sparingly. After that, it was used more often by the Centre to dismiss State governments, as in Andhra Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir in the 1980s. The Supreme Court has held that the use of Article 356 can be examined by the courts.
Beyond the textbook. For the exam: the validity of the proclamation of President's Rule can be reviewed by the courts. In reality: this was settled in the S. R. Bommai case (1994). The Court held that the President's satisfaction can be tested, and that a government's majority should be tested on the floor of the Assembly. Why it matters: if a question mentions a leading case on President's Rule, this is it.
Pause and predict: the Governor reports that a State's government cannot function as the Constitution requires, and the President issues a proclamation. What must happen next, and can a court look at the decision?
Check your answer: Parliament has to approve the proclamation, and the courts can examine whether it was valid.
Reorganisation of States
The map of India has been redrawn many times, mostly on the basis of language and in response to demands.
| Year | Event | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| December 1953 | States Reorganisation Commission set up | To examine the demand for linguistic States |
| 1956 | States reorganised on linguistic lines | Followed the Commission's report |
| 1960 | Gujarat and Maharashtra | Formed from the bilingual State of Bombay |
| 1966 | Punjab and Haryana | Separate States |
| After 1966 | Manipur, Tripura, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh | Formed later in the north east |
| 2000 | Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand | Carved from Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar |
| 2014 | Telangana | Carved out of Andhra Pradesh |
Conflicts between States
| Type | Example | Parties |
|---|---|---|
| Border | Belgaum | Maharashtra and Karnataka |
| Border | Boundary between the two States | Manipur and Nagaland |
| Border | Chandigarh | Punjab and Haryana. An accord in 1985 proposed giving Chandigarh to Punjab; it has not been put into effect |
| River water | Kaveri | Tamil Nadu and Karnataka |
| River water | Narmada | Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra |
Special provisions
Some regions have special provisions because of their history or their population. The north eastern States, such as Assam, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram, have a sizeable indigenous tribal population. Special provisions also exist for hill States like Himachal Pradesh and for Andhra Pradesh, Goa, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Sikkim and Telangana. Many of them are in Articles 371 to 371J, for example Article 371A for Nagaland and Article 371G for Mizoram.
Article 370 and Jammu and Kashmir. Until 2019, Article 370 gave Jammu and Kashmir a special status. Union and Concurrent List laws applied only with the State's concurrence, an internal-disturbance or financial Emergency could not be imposed without it, the Directive Principles did not apply, and the State had its own constitution and flag. This status no longer exists. Under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, the State was divided into two Union Territories, Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh, from 31 October 2019. The Supreme Court upheld the 2019 changes in a judgment in December 2023.
Timeline
| Year | Event | Why it mattered |
|---|---|---|
| 1953 | States Reorganisation Commission | Began linguistic reorganisation |
| 1956 | Reorganisation of States | The new map |
| 1960 | Gujarat and Maharashtra | Bombay divided |
| 1966 | Punjab and Haryana | Punjab divided |
| 1976 | 42nd Amendment | Education and Forests to the Concurrent List |
| 1983 and 1988 | Sarkaria Commission appointed and report | Recommendations on Governors |
| 1985 | Chandigarh accord | Not implemented |
| 1994 | S. R. Bommai case | President's Rule open to review |
| 2000 | Three new States | Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand |
| 2014 | Telangana | The newest State |
| 2019 | J&K Reorganisation Act | Two Union Territories from 31 October 2019 |
Exam traps
| The trap | Why it's tempting | The truth |
|---|---|---|
| "The Constitution calls India a federation." | We study federalism | Article 1 says Union of States |
| "Education is a State subject." | Schools are run by States | It is in the Concurrent List |
| "Residuary powers lie with the States." | The US model | They lie with the Union |
| "Sarkaria Commission reported in 1983." | The two years are close | Appointed 1983, reported 1988 |
| "President's Rule cannot be challenged in court." | Emergency powers look absolute | Courts can review it |
| "India has dual citizenship." | Federations like the US do | India has single citizenship |
| "Jammu and Kashmir was divided into three Union Territories." | The region has three divisions | Two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh |
| "Jharkhand was formed from Madhya Pradesh." | It borders several States | Jharkhand from Bihar, Chhattisgarh from MP, Uttarakhand from UP |
60-second revision
| Topic | Lock this in |
|---|---|
| Article 1 | Union of States; the word federation is not used |
| Lists | Union, State, Concurrent; residuary to the Union |
| Traps | Education is Concurrent; Cyber Laws residuary |
| Strong centre | Article 3, Emergency, finances, Governor, Article 257(1), All India Services |
| Phases | Cooperative, autonomy demands, mature federalism |
| Sarkaria | Appointed 1983, reported 1988 |
| Article 356 | Parliament approves, up to three years, open to review |
| States | 1953 SRC, 1956, 1960, 1966, 2000, 2014 |
| Disputes | Belgaum, Chandigarh, Kaveri, Narmada |
| Article 370 | Ended; two UTs from 31 October 2019 |
Where this chapter connects
- Previous: Judiciary explains how the Supreme Court settles Union and State disputes.
- Next: Local Governments adds a third tier below the States.
- Related: Executive covers the Governor, the President and the All India Services.
- Class XII link: Regional Aspirations continues the story of demands for autonomy and the reorganisation of States.
🎯 Practice MCQs
First 3 questions free · create a free account to unlock the rest — answers & explanations included, no payment needed
Q1. Which Article of the Constitution describes India as a "Union of States"?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Article 1 says India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States. Article 370 concerned Jammu and Kashmir, Article 257 concerns Union directions to States and Article 356 concerns President's Rule.
Q2. Consider the following statements. 1. Defence and Foreign Affairs are in the Union List. 2. Education is in the State List. 3. Residuary powers, including Cyber Laws, lie with the State Legislatures. Which statements are correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Education is in the Concurrent List and residuary powers lie with the Union, so statements 2 and 3 are wrong.
Q3. Match the items in List I with the years in List II. List I: (i) States Reorganisation Commission set up (ii) Sarkaria Commission report (iii) Gujarat and Maharashtra formed (iv) J&K Reorganisation Act in effect. List II: (p) 1988 (q) 1953 (r) 1960 (s) 2019
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The Commission was set up in December 1953, the Sarkaria report came in 1988, Gujarat and Maharashtra were formed in 1960 and the Reorganisation Act took effect in 2019.
🔒 12 more practice MCQs
Create a free account to unlock every MCQ in this chapter — answers and explanations included. No payment needed.
Already registered? Just log in and they'll all appear here.
Q4. Assertion (A): The Indian Constitution creates a federal system with a strong central government. Reason (R): At independence India had provinces created by the British and more than 500 princely states to be integrated into the Union.
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The task of integrating many units and the country's size and diversity were reasons for a strong centre, so the Reason explains the Assertion.
Q5. Which of the following is NOT a feature of Indian federalism?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
India has single citizenship. Dual citizenship is a feature of some other federations, such as the USA.
Q6. After the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, the former State of Jammu and Kashmir became
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The Act created two Union Territories from 31 October 2019. The special status under Article 370 no longer exists.
Q7. The Sarkaria Commission was appointed in which year, and what did it recommend about Governors?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The Commission was appointed in 1983 and reported in 1988. It recommended that Governors be appointed in a strictly non partisan way.
Q8. Which of the following are correctly identified as river water disputes?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Kaveri and Narmada are the two river water disputes discussed in the chapter. The other options are not.
Q9. From which State was Chhattisgarh carved out in 2000?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Chhattisgarh came from Madhya Pradesh, Uttarakhand from Uttar Pradesh and Jharkhand from Bihar. Telangana was formed in 2014 from Andhra Pradesh.
Q10. Article 257(1) provides that
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Article 257(1) is one of the features that make the Centre strong. The other options are not true of any provision.
Q11. Consider the following statements about Article 356. I. It can be used when the government of a State cannot be carried on in accordance with the Constitution. II. The proclamation must be approved by Parliament and can last up to three years. III. Its use cannot be examined by the courts. Which statements are correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Statements I and II are correct. The courts can examine the use of Article 356, so statement III is wrong.
Q12. Read the extract. A State demands that its language be protected and promoted, and another opposes the imposition of Hindi as an official language. These demands are best described as
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Demands about language and culture, such as the opposition to Hindi imposition in Tamil Nadu and the advancement of Punjabi in Punjab, are examples of cultural and linguistic autonomy.
Q13. Which sequence correctly describes the phases of Indian federalism?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Only option A describes the phases as the chapter does. The others use terms that do not appear in it.
Q14. Read the extract. A State government is dismissed under Article 356 on the basis of the Governor's report, and the State argues that the Governor acted on the wishes of the Centre. Which feature of Indian federalism does this illustrate?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The Governor is appointed by the Centre and may recommend President's Rule. The frequent use of Article 356 after 1967 caused debate about the Governor's role and led to the Sarkaria Commission's recommendations.
Q15. Articles 33 and 34 of the Constitution are about
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Article 33 allows Parliament to restrict certain rights of the armed forces and Article 34 deals with martial law. They are listed among the provisions that give the Union extra authority.
📊 Previous-Year Questions
Practise with real CUET Political Science previous-year papers — every question solved, with the correct answer and a step-by-step explanation.
View solved CUET PYQ papers →Ready to drill Political Science?
Unlock all MCQs, chapter tests, mocks & PYQs for ₹199/year.
Get UniDrill Pro