📌 Snapshot
- From Congress's 1989 defeat to coalition politics: Mandal, reforms, Ayodhya and elections up to 2019.
- Five developments at the close of the 1980s that changed the party system, and why each one mattered.
- The rise of OBC and Dalit politics, the Shah Bano case, Hindutva and the Ayodhya verdict of 9 November 2019.
- Prime Ministers since 1989, the NDA and UPA years, and the four point consensus among parties.
📖 Detailed Notes
Written and reviewed by Subhra Gupta, Humanities faculty at UniDrill (M.A. Sociology, University of Delhi · 7 years teaching Humanities). Based on NCERT Political Science Class XII (Politics in India since Independence), Chapter 8.
415 seats to 197 in five years: what happened?
In the 1984 Lok Sabha elections, Congress won 415 seats, one of the largest majorities in the history of the Lok Sabha. In 1989 it won 197. Within those five years, several issues came together that changed how Indian parties compete, who they speak for and what kinds of governments they form. This chapter follows those changes up to the 2019 election.
Five developments of the late 1980s
| Development | What it meant |
|---|---|
| Defeat of Congress in 1989 | End of the "Congress system": Congress no longer had a central place in the party system |
| Rise of the Mandal issue | Reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) became a main subject of national politics |
| New economic reforms | A shift from the economic model India had followed since Independence |
| Ram Janmabhoomi dispute | A debate on secularism and democracy that changed political language |
| Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi (May 1991) | Congress emerged as the largest party in 1991 and chose Narasimha Rao as Prime Minister |
These are listed by theme, not strictly by date. For example, the reforms began in the closing months of Rajiv Gandhi's government and became visible in 1991.
Timeline: 1978 to 2019
| Year | Event | Why it mattered |
|---|---|---|
| 1978 | Mandal Commission set up (B.P. Mandal); BAMCEF formed | Starting points for OBC and Dalit politics |
| 1980 | Mandal Commission report; BJP formed | 27% reservation recommended; BJP emerges from the break-up of the Janata Party |
| 1984 | BSP founded; BJP wins 2 seats; Congress wins 415 | High point of Congress, which fell five years later |
| 1985 | Shah Bano judgment | Debate on personal law and secularism |
| 1986 | Act on Muslim women's divorce rights; Faizabad court orders the Ayodhya structure unlocked | Both issues enter national politics |
| 1989 | Congress falls to 197; National Front government | Start of coalition era |
| August 1990 | Mandal recommendation implemented for central government jobs | Protests; OBC reservation at the centre of politics |
| May 1991 | Rajiv Gandhi assassinated | Congress emerges as single largest party |
| 1991 | New economic policy under Narasimha Rao and Manmohan Singh | Opening of the economy |
| November 1992 | Indra Sawhney judgment | Supreme Court upholds OBC reservation, with a creamy layer exclusion |
| December 1992 | Ayodhya structure demolished | Communal violence in several parts of the country |
| 1996 | United Front government | Congress outside support |
| 1998 and 1999 | NDA governments under Vajpayee | The 1999 government completed a full term |
| 2004 and 2009 | UPA governments under Manmohan Singh | Left outside support till July 2008 |
| 2014 and 2019 | BJP majorities (282, then 303) | Single party majorities after a long gap |
| 9 November 2019 | Ayodhya verdict | Constitution bench decision |
The end of the Congress system
For most of the years from 1952 to 1984, Congress was the party around which Indian politics revolved. In 1989, with 197 seats, it was out of power, and although it returned in 1991 as the largest party, it never regained its earlier central position. Many parties have since formed governments, and none had the kind of dominance Congress once enjoyed.
The era of coalitions
After the 1989 elections no party had a majority. The National Front (an alliance of the Janata Dal and some regional parties) formed a government under V.P. Singh, with outside support from two groups that stood at opposite ends of the political spectrum: the BJP and the Left Front. Neither joined the government. After 1989, it became a pattern that regional parties shaped who formed governments at the Centre.
| Government | Led by | Support | Remember |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Front (1989) | V.P. Singh | Outside support from BJP and Left Front | Janata Dal plus regional parties |
| United Front (1996) | Janata Dal and regional parties | Outside support from Congress, not BJP | Compare with 1989 |
| NDA (1998; 1999 to 2004) | BJP under Atal Behari Vajpayee | BJP-led coalition | 1999 government completed its full term |
| UPA (2004 to 2014) | Congress under Manmohan Singh | Left outside support till July 2008 | Two terms |
| NDA (2014 onwards) | BJP under Narendra Modi | BJP with majority on its own | 282 in 2014, 303 in 2019 |
Prime Ministers since 1989
| Prime Minister | Period |
|---|---|
| V.P. Singh | December 1989 to November 1990 |
| Chandra Shekhar | November 1990 to June 1991 |
| P.V. Narasimha Rao | June 1991 to May 1996 |
| Atal Behari Vajpayee | May 1996 (13 days) |
| H.D. Deve Gowda | June 1996 to April 1997 |
| I.K. Gujral | April 1997 to March 1998 |
| Atal Behari Vajpayee | March 1998 to May 2004 |
| Manmohan Singh | May 2004 to May 2014 |
| Narendra Modi | May 2014 onwards |
The 1999 NDA government was the first non-Congress government to complete a full five-year term. It followed an earlier NDA government that lasted about thirteen months from 1998.
Beyond the textbook. For the exam: no party won a clear majority of Lok Sabha seats in any election from 1989 to 2014. In reality: the Lok Sabha has 543 elected seats, so a majority needs 272. This is the line Congress was far below in 1989 (197), and the BJP crossed in 2014 (282) and 2019 (303). A single party winning more than half the seats had not happened for thirty years before 2014.
Pause and predict: In 1989 the BJP and the Left Front both supported the same government from outside. In 1996 the Congress supported the United Front from outside. Which one of these two governments had the BJP's outside support?
Check your answer: The National Front of 1989. The 1996 United Front was supported by Congress, not by the BJP. The simple memory aid: 1989 means BJP plus Left, 1996 means Congress.
OBC politics and the Mandal Commission
Why OBCs entered national politics. Caste-based mobilisation of the backward classes had its roots in the lower-caste movements of the colonial period. It reached national political expression after the 1980s. The Janata Party government of 1977 was an early expression of this politics, and the Janata Dal carried it forward in the 1980s.
Mandal Commission: the sequence. The Second Backward Classes Commission, chaired by B.P. Mandal, was set up in 1978. It submitted its report in 1980, recommending that "backward classes" be understood as backward castes, and that 27 per cent of seats in educational institutions and government jobs be reserved for them, along with other recommendations such as land reform. In August 1990, the National Front government decided to implement the job reservation at the Centre. This led to strong protests, mainly in north India. The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case, and in November 1992 the Court upheld it while excluding the "creamy layer", the better off sections of the OBCs.
The chain in one line: 1978 Commission set up → 1980 report → August 1990 implementation → protests → November 1992 Indra Sawhney judgment
Two views. For the exam: supporters of the Mandal decision argued that caste is the main marker of social and educational backwardness and that reservation would give OBCs a share in power and public jobs. Another reading: opponents argued that caste-based reservation would sharpen caste divisions and that other criteria should be considered. The Supreme Court's creamy layer exclusion was part of the answer to this debate.
Dalit politics: from BAMCEF to the BSP
BAMCEF (Backward and Minority Communities Employees Federation) was formed in 1978 and favoured political power for the bahujan, a term for Dalits, OBCs, Adivasis and religious minorities together. From it came the Dalit Shoshit Samaj Sangharsh Samiti (DS-4) and then, in 1984, the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) under Kanshi Ram (1934 to 2006). The BSP had a breakthrough in Uttar Pradesh in the 1989 and 1991 elections. Kanshi Ram saw political power as the master key to social equality.
| Organisation | Year | Founder or link |
|---|---|---|
| BAMCEF | 1978 | Kanshi Ram |
| DS-4 | Between BAMCEF and BSP | Kanshi Ram |
| BSP | 1984 | Kanshi Ram |
New economic policies
A structural adjustment programme began in the last months of Rajiv Gandhi's government and became visible in 1991 under Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao, with Manmohan Singh as Finance Minister. It moved the economy away from the model followed since Independence: opening the economy, reducing licensing and encouraging private and foreign investment. Later governments continued the policy, though it has drawn criticism.
Communalism, secularism and democracy
After the Janata Party broke up, supporters of the former Jana Sangh formed the BJP in 1980. It started with "Gandhian Socialism" and did poorly in 1984, winning only two seats. From 1986, it began to emphasise nationalism and the politics of Hindutva. The idea of Hindutva was popularised by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar: to be Indian, one must accept India as one's fatherland (pitrubhu) and holy land (punyabhu). Its supporters hold that a strong nation rests on a united national culture.
The Shah Bano case. In 1985, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of Shah Bano, a 62-year-old divorced Muslim woman who had asked for maintenance from her former husband under criminal law. The government then passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, which nullified the judgment, following the opposition of some sections of the Muslim community.
Two views. For the exam: the BJP and other critics described the 1986 Act as appeasement of a minority community. Another reading: women's groups and many legal commentators saw the Act as a loss for the rights of divorced Muslim women. The case is read as part of the wider debate on secularism and personal law.
Pause and predict: The Shah Bano judgment was in 1985 and the Act in 1986. A question says "the Act led to the judgment". Is it right?
Check your answer: No. The Court ruled first (1985). The Act of 1986 came afterwards and nullified the ruling.
The Ayodhya issue
The dispute concerned a site in Ayodhya where the Babri Masjid, built in 1528, stood. Many Hindus regard the site as the birthplace of Ram. The structure was closed in 1949 after court proceedings began. In 1986, a district court in Faizabad ordered it opened for worship, and a foundation-laying ceremony (shilaanyas) was held, though further construction was not permitted. The Vishwa Hindu Parishad, the BJP and allied groups campaigned for a temple. In December 1992, the structure was demolished, and communal violence broke out in several parts of the country.
The legal dispute ended with the Supreme Court's verdict of 9 November 2019. A five-judge constitution bench gave a unanimous decision: the disputed site was to go to a trust for the construction of a temple, and an appropriate separate site was to be allotted to the Sunni Central Waqf Board for a mosque.
The chain in one line: 1528 structure → 1949 closed → 1986 unlocked → 1992 demolition → 9 November 2019 verdict
Elections from 2004 to 2019
| Election | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | NDA defeated; UPA formed by Congress | Left Front gave outside support |
| July 2008 | Left Front withdrew support | Over the Indo-US nuclear deal |
| 2009 | Congress rose from 145 to 206 seats | Manmohan Singh Prime Minister for a second term |
| 2014 | BJP won 282 seats | First single-party majority in 30 years; Narendra Modi Prime Minister |
| 2019 | BJP won 303 seats | Second successive majority |
The new consensus
Despite sharp competition, the parties share four broad understandings.
| Element | Meaning |
|---|---|
| New economic policies | Most parties accept the direction of the reforms |
| Backward castes | Parties support the political and social claims of backward castes, including reservation |
| State level parties | Regional parties are accepted as partners in national government |
| Pragmatism over ideology | Alliances are formed for practical reasons; many NDA partners did not share the BJP's ideology yet joined its government |
Key people and terms
| Person or term | Who or what | Remember |
|---|---|---|
| V.P. Singh | PM of the National Front government | Mandal implementation, August 1990 |
| B.P. Mandal | Chairman, Second Backward Classes Commission | Set up 1978; report 1980 |
| Kanshi Ram (1934 to 2006) | Founder of BAMCEF, DS-4, BSP | Political power as master key |
| P.V. Narasimha Rao | PM, 1991 to 1996 | Economic reforms with Manmohan Singh |
| Vinayak Damodar Savarkar | Popularised Hindutva | Pitrubhu and punyabhu |
| Creamy layer | Better off sections of OBCs | Excluded from reservation by the Court |
| NDA / UPA | BJP led / Congress led alliances | NDA 1998 to 2004, UPA 2004 to 2014 |
| Shilaanyas | Foundation laying ceremony at the Ayodhya site | Further construction was not permitted |
| Rajiv Gandhi | Assassinated May 1991 | During election campaign in Tamil Nadu |
Exam traps
| The trap | Why it's tempting | The truth |
|---|---|---|
| "Mandal Commission reported in 1990." | 1990 is the year of implementation | Set up 1978; report 1980; implemented August 1990; upheld November 1992 |
| "The BSP was founded in 1978." | BAMCEF was founded in 1978 | BAMCEF 1978; BSP 1984 |
| "BJP and Jana Sangh are the same party." | One grew from the other | The BJP was formed in 1980 by supporters of the former Jana Sangh |
| "The 1986 Act came before the Shah Bano judgment." | The two are linked | The judgment was in 1985; the Act in 1986 |
| "Congress won 197 seats in 2009." | 197 is a familiar figure | 197 was 1989; in 2009 Congress won 206 |
| "BJP won 303 seats in 2014." | Both are BJP majorities | 2014: 282; 2019: 303 |
| "The National Front of 1989 had Congress support." | Congress backed another coalition | The BJP and Left Front backed the 1989 government; Congress backed the 1996 United Front |
| "The Ayodhya verdict was a split decision." | Major cases often are | The five-judge bench was unanimous |
60-second revision
| Topic | Lock this in |
|---|---|
| 1984 and 1989 | Congress 415 then 197 · end of the Congress system |
| Mandal | 1978 set up · 1980 report · 27% · August 1990 implemented · Indra Sawhney, November 1992 · creamy layer |
| Dalit politics | BAMCEF 1978 · DS-4 · BSP 1984 · Kanshi Ram · UP 1989 and 1991 |
| Reforms | 1991 · Narasimha Rao · Manmohan Singh |
| Shah Bano | Judgment 1985 · Act 1986 |
| BJP | Formed 1980 · 2 seats in 1984 · Hindutva after 1986 |
| Ayodhya | 1528 · 1949 · 1986 · December 1992 · 9 November 2019, 5 to 0 |
| Coalitions | National Front 1989 (BJP + Left outside) · United Front 1996 (Congress outside) · NDA 1998 and 1999 · UPA 2004 and 2009 |
| Majorities | BJP 282 (2014) · 303 (2019) |
| Consensus | Economic policy · backward castes · State parties · pragmatism |
Where this chapter connects
- Previous: Regional Aspirations shows why regional parties became important partners in national politics.
- Earlier background: Era of One-Party Dominance describes the Congress system whose end this chapter records, and The Crisis of Democratic Order covers the Janata experiment and the Mandal Commission's origin.
- Class XI link: Secularism and Social Justice give the ideas behind the debates on personal law and reservation.
🎯 Practice MCQs
First 3 questions free · create a free account to unlock the rest — answers & explanations included, no payment needed
Q1. Match List I with List II. List I: (i) Mandal Commission (ii) Indra Sawhney case (iii) Shah Bano case (iv) Ayodhya verdict. List II: (p) Judgment of 1985 on maintenance for a divorced Muslim woman (q) Second Backward Classes Commission set up in 1978 (r) Decision of a constitution bench on 9 November 2019 (s) Judgment of November 1992 upholding OBC reservation
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The Mandal Commission was set up in 1978, Indra Sawhney upheld OBC reservation in 1992, Shah Bano concerned maintenance in 1985 and the Ayodhya verdict was delivered on 9 November 2019. The other options swap the descriptions.
Q2. The number of Lok Sabha seats won by Congress in 1984 and 1989 respectively was
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Congress won 415 seats in 1984 and 197 in 1989. Option B reverses the years, 206 is the 2009 figure and 282 is the BJP figure for 2014.
Q3. Consider the following statements about the Mandal Commission. I. It was chaired by B.P. Mandal. II. It submitted its report in 1990. III. It recommended 27 per cent reservation for OBCs in educational institutions and government jobs. Which statements are correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Statements I and III are correct. Statement II is wrong: the Commission reported in 1980, and the National Front government decided to implement it in August 1990.
🔒 9 more practice MCQs
Create a free account to unlock every MCQ in this chapter — answers and explanations included. No payment needed.
Already registered? Just log in and they'll all appear here.
Q4. Read the extract. A government was formed after the 1989 elections by an alliance of a national party and some regional parties. Two groups with opposite ideologies supported it from outside but did not join it. Which government is this?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
The National Front under V.P. Singh was supported from outside by the BJP and the Left Front. The 1996 United Front was supported by Congress, and the NDA and UPA governments came later.
Q5. Assertion (A): Coalition governments were the norm at the Centre between 1989 and 2014. Reason (R): No single party won a clear majority of Lok Sabha seats in any election in that period.
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Without a single party majority, governments had to be formed with the help of other parties, mainly regional ones. Both statements are true and the reason explains the assertion.
Q6. Which of the following statements about the BSP and Kanshi Ram is correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Kanshi Ram described political power as the master key. BAMCEF dates from 1978 and the BSP from 1984, the BSP's breakthrough was in Uttar Pradesh, and Kanshi Ram founded BAMCEF rather than opposing it.
Q7. Arrange the following in chronological order. 1. Shah Bano judgment 2. Implementation of Mandal recommendation for central jobs 3. Indra Sawhney judgment 4. Ayodhya verdict by the constitution bench
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The order is 1985, August 1990, November 1992 and November 2019. The other options misplace one of the events.
Q8. Which statements about Hindutva and the BJP are correct? I. The BJP was formed in 1980. II. The BJP won only two Lok Sabha seats in 1984. III. Hindutva was popularised by V.D. Savarkar. IV. The BJP was formed in 1951.
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Statements I, II and III are correct. Statement IV is wrong, because the Jana Sangh was an earlier party and the BJP was formed in 1980 by its supporters after the Janata Party broke up.
Q9. Consider the following statements about elections from 2004 to 2019. I. The UPA government of 2004 was supported from outside by the Left Front. II. The Left Front withdrew its support in July 2008 over the Indo-US nuclear deal. III. The BJP won 282 seats in 2014. IV. Congress won 206 seats in 2004. Which statements are correct?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Statements I, II and III are correct. Statement IV is wrong because Congress won 206 seats in 2009, not in 2004.
Q10. Read the extract. A five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court gave a unanimous verdict on 9 November 2019 in a dispute that had begun with a structure built in 1528 and demolished in 1992. The dispute concerned a site in
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
The description matches the Ayodhya dispute. The other cities are not the subject of the verdict.
Q11. Which of the following is NOT one of the four elements of the new consensus among political parties?
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The fourth element is the importance of pragmatic considerations over ideology, the opposite of strict ideological purity. The other three are elements of the consensus.
Q12. Match the Prime Minister with the period. List I: (i) V.P. Singh (ii) H.D. Deve Gowda (iii) I.K. Gujral (iv) Manmohan Singh. List II: (p) April 1997 to March 1998 (q) December 1989 to November 1990 (r) May 2004 to May 2014 (s) June 1996 to April 1997
▸ Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
V.P. Singh served from December 1989 to November 1990, Deve Gowda from June 1996 to April 1997, Gujral from April 1997 to March 1998 and Manmohan Singh from May 2004 to May 2014. The other options swap the periods.
📊 Previous-Year Questions
Practise with real CUET Political Science previous-year papers — every question solved, with the correct answer and a step-by-step explanation.
View solved CUET PYQ papers →Ready to drill Political Science?
Unlock all MCQs, chapter tests, mocks & PYQs for ₹199/year.
Get UniDrill Pro